Four-to-One Vote Retroactively Approves Unpermitted Concrete Buffer Slab at 264 Clap Road
Key Points
- Commission retroactively approves 264 Clap Road concrete slab despite buffer zone violation
- Satuit Brook water quality study to be funded by Toll Brothers mitigation reserves
- Board considers mandates for permanent 36-inch conservation posts to prevent removal by homeowners
- Generator at 75 River Street requires elevation verification for AE13 flood zone compliance
- New volunteer group forming to manage invasive species and trail maintenance at Driftway Park
The Scituate Conservation Commission grappled with the limits of the town’s 50-foot "no-disturb" buffer zone this week, ultimately granting retroactive approval for a concrete slab installed without a permit at 264 Clap Road. The decision followed a tense discussion regarding property owner education and the enforcement of long-standing environmental restrictions. Applicant Paul Rainard admitted to the oversight, explaining that a 12x20-foot area had been prepared for a shed before realizing the proximity to protected wetlands. A concrete slab has been placed by mistake before we got approval. That's our fault,
Rainard told the board. We were unaware of the proximity to the buffer zone.
The violation sparked a divide among members. Commissioner Penny Scott-Pipes voiced the lone opposition to allowing the structure to remain on its current foundation. I don't feel that shed should go on a concrete slab in the buffer,
Scott-Pipes argued. The concrete slab should come out. It can be on blocks off the ground, but no more disturbance out there.
Other members, however, sought a middle ground through environmental mitigation. Member Eric noted that while it was unfortunate
the slab disrupted previous mitigation plantings from a former owner, he was amendable to additional native plantings being put in
to offset the impact. Chair Frank Snow noted the property's history of infringements, expressing disappointment that conservation markers had not been required during previous hearings to prevent such "plausible deniability" by new owners. Motion Made by E. [Member] for a Negative 3 determination for 264 Clap Road with conditions for mitigation and conservation markers. Motion Passed (4-1).
The theme of flood zone compliance continued with a request for a new generator at 75 River Street. Applicant Dave Zerella proposed an elevated aluminum stand for the unit to navigate the AE13 and AO flood zones. We want to install a generator at the right rear of the property... on an aluminum stand with sauna tubes,
Zerella explained. Conservation Agent Jen Uram supported the use of a stand over a concrete pad but emphasized that the final height must be verified. Frank Snow advised the applicant to coordinate closely with the Building Commissioner, noting that the bottom of the generator needs to be above the flood zone.
Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipes for a Negative 3 determination for 75 River Street pending elevation verification. Motion Passed (4-0).
Frustration over the removal of conservation markers by residents led to a broader administrative discussion on how to protect the town's sensitive borders. Roger asked the board, How do we make sure we continue to educate the community so things like this don't happen? Especially when folks move into town and there may already be landscaping that was part of a prior approval.
Suggestions included adding educational flyers to property tax bills and mandating more permanent, robust signage. Robbie suggested more substantial hardware, noting, You could make the marker like a 36-inch post that says you can't take it down,
to prevent homeowners from removing them after receiving their Certificates of Compliance.
The Commission is also looking to leverage mitigation funds from the Toll Brothers project to launch a comprehensive water quality study of Satuit Brook. Frank Snow described the goal as using the data as a springboard for grants to improve drainage and remove contaminants.
The project may involve a dual approach using the Conway School for sustainable landscape planning and the Woods Hole Group for technical analysis of culverts. Roger advocated for involving local students in the effort, noting that Mr. Maguire at the high school is a great resource
for marine science and weather data. Scott-Pipes agreed with the educational outreach, adding, Start the kids young.
The board also discussed potentially hosting a booth at Heritage Days to display maps and brochures of the brook’s watershed.
In other business, the board reviewed a Certificate of Compliance for 1 Hollett Street, where Scott-Pipes remained vigilant about wildlife passage. Did you look at the fencing along the marsh side at Hollett Street?
she asked the Agent. It needs to be a foot above the ground to let the critters through. You know me and the critters.
A new resident also addressed the board to confirm the status of the filing, stating, I just wanted to make sure I understood one piece of the process. On the certificate of compliance, I want to make sure that both of those were in.
Uram confirmed the paperwork was in order for the 1 Hollett Street and 7 Border Street filings.
Updates were also provided on volunteer efforts at Driftway Park, where residents have expressed interest in managing invasive species and clearing trails. It would be great to have a volunteer group embrace Driftway Park,
Snow remarked, noting that the town had quickly exhausted its budget for professional landscaping at the site last year. The Commission also plans to schedule a future in-person meeting focused specifically on the health of the Gulf River salt marsh, following a recent joint informative session with the town of Cohasset.