Unpermitted 42 Crescent Avenue Patio Sparks Fury as Turner Road Reconstruction Stalls

Key Points

  • Commissioners label 42 Crescent Avenue a "nightmare" project following unpermitted waterfront construction
  • 164 Turner Road reconstruction stalls as peer reviewer issues 15-page technical critique
  • Homeowner at 8 New Street proposes stainless steel cable system to secure property during floods
  • Strict native planting requirements mandated for septic and pool projects on River Street and Stockbridge Road
  • Commission maintains 50-foot buffer zone policy through mandated patio removal at 61 Brook Street

The Scituate Conservation Commission leveled sharp criticism at the developers of 42 Crescent Avenue during its virtual meeting on Monday night, following the discovery of an unpermitted waterfront patio and retaining wall that board members described as a flagrant violation of town approvals. The enforcement discussion headlined a marathon session dominated by contentious coastal construction projects and technical disputes over salt marsh protections.

The situation at 42 Crescent Avenue reached a boiling point as the commission confronted builder Todd Ken and representative Darren Grady over work that exceeded the scope of the original Order of Conditions. While Ken argued the deviations were unintentional, stating it wasn't malicious... the original NOI did show it on there, board members expressed deep frustration with the project's history. Penny Scott-Pipe, who has long maintained a skeptical eye toward salt marsh impacts, did not mince words regarding the developer's track record. This project has been a nightmare since the day it began, Scott-Pipe said. You do just what you want out here. This mitigation is not enough.

Chair Frank Snow, who joined the meeting after the initial call to order, echoed the sentiment that the board’s previous revisions had been ignored. We looked at this plan, we decided that was too intrusive, and we had a revised plan that didn't have it on there—and then it got built because that's what you wanted to build, Snow noted. The commission ultimately continued the enforcement matter, demanding more significant restoration or mitigation efforts before the project can move toward compliance.

Technical gridlock also stalled the reconstruction of a single-family home at 164 Turner Road. While attorney Jeff Delissi argued the project to elevate the home on piles would eliminate a hazard and improve drainage and flooding issues, peer reviewer Devon Taber of Lucas Environmental presented a daunting 15-page review letter detailing significant outstanding technical concerns. Taber noted that critical analysis of coastal dune function and resource delineation remained unresolved. I think it would be best if we had a working session to hash out those items as a collective technical team, Taber suggested.

The Turner Road proposal drew significant fire from neighbors who have spent months monitoring the sensitive site. Scott Greenbaum raised concerns regarding the integrity of sewer lines and the impact of driving piles into cobble, while Jim Clark questioned the weight of construction mats on the marsh bank. Joanne Wyckoff insisted that a definitive salt marsh delineation is required for the tide-gate controlled area. Commissioner Robbie raised procedural concerns about moving the debate to a technical working session, noting, I'm concerned that if it's discussed in the working session, it's not necessarily public. He requested that all findings be clearly presented in the next public hearing. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to continue the hearing for 164 Turner Road to March 16th. Motion Passed (5-0-0).

Innovative flood mitigation emerged as a bright spot during the review of 8 New Street. Property owner Chris Wynn proposed a unique storage solution for the area beneath his elevated home, using stainless steel cabling to secure property while allowing floodwaters to pass through unimpeded. A lot of decks these days have what they call a view rail... stainless steel cable. The same concept would apply to keeping stuff from ending up in the river, Wynn explained. Scott-Pipe praised the concept as unique for its transparency to moving water. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions for 8 New Street. Motion Passed (5-0-0).

The commission also advanced several residential upgrades aimed at bringing aging infrastructure into compliance with environmental standards. At 37 River Street, Rick Savant presented a plan to abandon an existing cesspool in favor of a new Title 5 compliant septic system. During the review, Eric pushed for higher landscaping standards, asking Savant, I would ask if the applicant would be open to the native variety of coastal rose, Rosa caroliniana, as Rosa rugosa is now restricted. Savant agreed to the substitution. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions for 37 River Street. Motion Passed (5-0-0).

Water management was the primary focus for a new pool and cabana at 138 Stockbridge Road. Gabriel Padilla and peer reviewer Janet Bernardo discussed a subsurface chamber system designed to infiltrate runoff on-site. While Bernardo felt the applicant answered our concerns adequately, Eric sought guarantees that pool maintenance wouldn't impact nearby wetlands. During the pool shutdown... where is that water going? We don't want that being drained into the buffer, he said. The commission approved the project with specific conditions governing pool drainage. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions for 138 Stockbridge Road. Motion Passed (5-0-0).

The board also enforced its strict 50-foot buffer strip policy at 61 Brook Street. Brad Holmes presented a revised mitigation plan that includes removing a portion of an existing patio to create a nice vegetated buffer strip along the brook. Conservation Agent Jen Smith recommended that the commission require conservation plaques to the fence to ensure the plantings are protected in perpetuity. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions for 61 Brook Street. Motion Passed (5-0-0).

In other business, Paul Gun presented a deck and addition project at 12 Gilson Road, which the board found to have minimal impact as it remains largely within a previously disturbed lawn area. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions for 12 Gilson Road. Motion Passed (5-0-0). The commission also processed several administrative delays, including 90-96 Stockbridge Road and 49 Whittier Drive. Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to continue 90-96 Stockbridge Road to May 18th. Motion Passed (5-0-0). Motion Made by P. Scott-Pipe to continue 49 Whittier Drive to March 9th. Motion Passed (5-0-0).